We’ve heard for a long time that Red Wing’s spending was quite high as compared to other cities in our area. The spending comparison linked below lays out current expenditures, public safety, and economic development, and compares Red Wing to nine other area cities. Public safety and economic development are part of total current expenditures. Current expenditures do not include debt service or capital outlays. I’m also including the 2009 State Auditor’s Report on Minnesota City Budgets upon which my comparisons are based.
City population is based upon 2008 census estimates. Of the cities listed, Red Wing, Albert Lea, Austin, and Winona have experienced population declines since the 2000 census. The other cities have grown.
If Red Wing lowered its per capita spending down to Owatonna’s level, the next highest city, it would have to cut its budget by 26%, or $4.7 million dollars. To get down to the average per capita spending of the cities on the list we’d be looking at 39% or, $7 million in cuts. To get down to Farmington’s per capita spending, the lowest on the list, nearly $10 million would have to be cut, over 1/2 of our current budget.
While spending on lobbyist’s, the incinerator, and the Port draw attention, let’s not ignore overall spending. I recognize that each city has different issues and understanding our spending is not as simple as comparisons to others, but the comparisons can be starting point for better understanding.
You can view online or download and save. Comments appreciated.
Kent D. Laugen
Red Wing Spending Comparison
State Auditor’s Report
Minnesota Census Information